I shudder when I hear stories of physicians who order a CT scan to evaluate a patient's pain without examining the painful area. So I was happy to read that Dr. Abraham Verghese is on a mission to save the art of the physical exam.
Fancy tests such as echocardiograms and MRIs provide high-resolution pictures and detailed data about the body that can be invaluable in understanding exactly what is going on with a patient and in making wise treatment decisions. High-tech tests have been an essential factor in my surviving lymphoma.
But diagnostic tests should supplement the physical exam, not replace it. Radiologists can do a better job interpreting the x-rays or scans if given information about the patient obtained through a thorough physical exam by the referring physician. And "[a] proper exam also earns trust, he [Verghese] said, and serves as a ritual that transforms two strangers into doctor and patient."





Read this article and loved it when it came out in the NYT some weeks ago. Always a good thing to remember!
Posted by: Felicity Lenes | October 24, 2010 at 10:07 AM
The message to medical students and clinicians is you might be swimming against the tide if you take time to do a thorough exam. You might get castigated for being "too slow." Hold your ground!
With hope, Wendy
Posted by: Wendy S. Harpham, M.D. | October 24, 2010 at 10:21 AM
Yes, I've noticed the annual physical involves almost nothing physical anymore.
Posted by: sue c | October 25, 2010 at 01:23 PM